Ads
related to: how to find out if copyrighted
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
If the image is tagged as Fair use, then most probably you cannot.See the Fair use section for more details. You can for all other images released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License or a similarly free license provided you abide by the license conditions – include a link back to the wikipage for that picture or to the creator's website and license any ...
At the bare minimum, the copyright notice had to include the word "copyright" or an acceptable abbreviation (like a circled C), the year of publication (which could not be more than one year ahead of the actual publication), and the name of any entity claiming the copyright.
If you find an image on a foreign language Wikipedia, you'll need to copy it and re-upload it to either English Wikipedia or (preferably) the Wikimedia Commons to use it here. If you can't read the language to determine copyright status, try using the images on the copyright templates instead to figure out what they mean.
This laid the foundation for the preservation of global music in the public domain, a distinction formalized alongside copyright systems in the 17th century. Musicians copyrighted their publications of musical notation as literary writings, but performing copyrighted pieces and creating derivative works were not restricted by early copyright laws.
A copyrighted image should have a tag attached to it: {{Non-free logo}} An example of such an image page would be the Apple Computer logo . Image pages with the {{ Non-free logo }} tag should also contain some additional (often lengthy) explanations known as a "non-free media use rationale" that justify their use on Wikipedia – this ...
Bojo Skankins, it is certainly possible to find a face-on image of the front of the book. The other inages that you used as examples are of books which have only text on the cover, or text only on the spine. The only copyright involved is the copyright of the photographer of the 3D image.
Using a large portion of the copyrighted work is less likely to be fair use. However, courts have occasionally found use of an entire work to be fair use, and in other contexts, using even a small amount of a copyrighted work was determined not to be fair use because the selection was an important part—or the "heart"—of the work.
This law removed the requirement that a second term of copyright protection is contingent on a renewal registration. The effect was that any work copyrighted in the US in 1964 or after had a copyright term of 75 years, whether or not a formal copyright renewal was filed. There are some legal reasons for filing such renewal registrations.