When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: nvme gaming performance test drive

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. NVM Express - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NVM_Express

    Historically, most SSDs used buses such as SATA, SAS, or Fibre Channel for interfacing with the rest of a computer system. Since SSDs became available in mass markets, SATA has become the most typical way for connecting SSDs in personal computers; however, SATA was designed primarily for interfacing with mechanical hard disk drives (HDDs), and it became increasingly inadequate for SSDs, which ...

  3. IOPS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOPS

    Input/output operations per second (IOPS, pronounced eye-ops) is an input/output performance measurement used to characterize computer storage devices like hard disk drives (HDD), solid state drives (SSD), and storage area networks (SAN).

  4. List of Intel SSDs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_SSDs

    These new drives, dubbed by the press as the X25-M and X18-M G2 [7] [8] (or generation 2), reduced prices by up to 60 percent while offering lower latency and improved performance. [ 9 ] On February 1, 2010, Intel and Micron announced that they were gearing up for production of NAND flash memory using a new 25-nanometer process. [ 10 ]

  5. Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-Monitoring,_Analysis...

    A drive that implements S.M.A.R.T. may optionally implement a number of self-test or maintenance routines, and the results of the tests are kept in the self-test log. The self-test routines may be used to detect any unreadable sectors on the disk, so that they may be restored from back-up sources (for example, from other disks in a RAID ).

  6. 3D XPoint - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_XPoint

    Optane 900p sequential mixed read-write performance, compared to a wide range of well reputed consumer SSDs. The graph shows how traditional SSD's performance drops sharply to around 500–700 MB/s for all but nearly-pure read and write tasks, whereas the 3D XPoint device is unaffected and consistently produces around 2200–2400 MB/s throughput in the same test.

  7. ReadyBoost - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReadyBoost

    Desktop hard drives can sustain anywhere from 2 to 10 times the transfer speed of USB 2.0 flash drives but are equal to or slower than USB 3.0 and Firewire (IEEE 1394) for sequential data. USB 2.0 and faster flash drives have faster random access times: typically around 1 ms, compared to 12 ms for mainstream desktop hard drives.