When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Supreme Court rules owners of seized cars are not entitled to ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-innocent...

    The court considered appeals from two women whose cars were seized by Alabama police who had arrested the drivers on drug charges. Halima Culley had lent her car to her college-age son. Lena ...

  3. Civil forfeiture in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the...

    What has caused controversy is when the property of innocent persons is seized by police who believe that the seized items were involved in criminal activity. A June 2019 study found that more equitable sharing funds do not translate into more crimes solved, not improving overall police effectiveness. Such funds also do not lead to less drug use.

  4. US Supreme Court reinforces police power in seized vehicle ruling

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-reinforces...

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday reinforced the power of law enforcement authorities to retain seized property belonging to people not charged with a crime, ruling in favor of Alabama officials ...

  5. Police Cannot Seize Property Indefinitely After an Arrest ...

    www.aol.com/news/police-cannot-seize-property...

    The plaintiffs each had their property seized by D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). Five of the plaintiffs were arrested during a Black Lives Matter protest in the Adams Morgan ...

  6. Asset forfeiture - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_forfeiture

    In 1965, the United States Supreme Court overturned the seizure of a vehicle by the Government of Pennsylvania in One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania seized using illegally obtained evidence. In 1996, the Supreme Court in Bennis v. Michigan upheld the seizure of a vehicle as contraband, despite the owner's use of the innocent owner defense.

  7. Brendlin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendlin_v._California

    As a passenger in a vehicle, Brendlin could not affirmatively submit until the vehicle was stopped on the side of the road. Third, the California Supreme Court resisted the conclusion the Court drew because it feared that occupants of cars merely stuck in traffic would also be "seized" under a contrary holding.

  8. US Supreme Court leans toward Alabama in dispute over ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-leans-toward...

    The case argued before the justices tests the power of law enforcement to retain property seized by police that belongs to people not charged with a crime. ... Halima Culley's car was seized when ...

  9. United States v. Mendenhall - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_V._Mendenhall

    A person is "seized" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment if a "reasonable person" in the same position "would have believed that he was not free to leave." This test must be viewed under the totality of the circumstances. Court membership; Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Associate Justices William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart