When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Converse (logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Converse_(logic)

    The white area shows where the statement is false. Let S be a statement of the form P implies Q (P → Q). Then the converse of S is the statement Q implies P (Q → P). In general, the truth of S says nothing about the truth of its converse, [2] unless the antecedent P and the consequent Q are logically equivalent. For example, consider the ...

  3. Affirming the consequent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent

    In propositional logic, affirming the consequent (also known as converse error, fallacy of the converse, or confusion of necessity and sufficiency) is a formal fallacy (or an invalid form of argument) that is committed when, in the context of an indicative conditional statement, it is stated that because the consequent is true, therefore the ...

  4. Contraposition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraposition

    If a statement's inverse is false, then its converse is false (and vice versa). If a statement's negation is false, then the statement is true (and vice versa). If a statement (or its contrapositive) and the inverse (or the converse) are both true or both false, then it is known as a logical biconditional.

  5. Propositional calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus

    It is also called propositional logic, [2] statement logic, [1] sentential calculus, [3] sentential logic, [4] [1] or sometimes zeroth-order logic. [ b ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] Sometimes, it is called first-order propositional logic [ 9 ] to contrast it with System F , but it should not be confused with first-order logic .

  6. Immediate inference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immediate_inference

    Given a type A statement, "All S are P.", one can make the immediate inference that "All non-P are non-S" which is the contrapositive of the given statement. Given a type O statement, "Some S are not P.", one can make the immediate inference that "Some non-P are not non-S" which is the contrapositive of the given statement.

  7. Logical truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_truth

    For instance, two statements or more are logically incompatible if, and only if their conjunction is logically false. One statement logically implies another when it is logically incompatible with the negation of the other. A statement is logically true if, and only if its opposite is logically false. The opposite statements must contradict one ...

  8. Negation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negation

    Classical negation is an operation on one logical value, typically the value of a proposition, that produces a value of true when its operand is false, and a value of false when its operand is true. Thus if statement P {\displaystyle P} is true, then ¬ P {\displaystyle \neg P} (pronounced "not P") would then be false; and conversely, if ¬ P ...

  9. Converse nonimplication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Converse_nonimplication

    In logic, converse nonimplication [1] is a logical connective which is the negation of converse implication (equivalently, the negation of the converse of implication). Definition [ edit ]