When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Cooley v. Board of Wardens - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooley_v._Board_of_Wardens

    Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 53 U.S. (12 How.) 299 (1852), was a US Supreme Court case that held that a Pennsylvania law requiring all ships entering or leaving Philadelphia to hire a local pilot did not violate the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution. Those who did not comply with the law had been required to pay a fee.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Taney Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Hotchkiss v. Greenwood: 52 U.S. 248 (1851) Early standard for non-obviousness in United States patent law: Strader v. Graham: 51 U.S. 82 (1851) slavery and the application of state laws thereof Cooley v. Board of Wardens: 53 U.S. 299 (1852) pilotage laws under the Commerce Clause: Dred Scott v. Sandford: 60 U.S. 393 (1857) slavery, the ...

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 53

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...

  5. Taney Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taney_Court

    Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852): In a decision delivered by Justice Curtis, the court upheld a Pennsylvania law requiring vessels leaving Philadelphia to use a local pilot or pay a fine. In the decision, the court set an important precedent regarding the Commerce Clause , charting a middle course between federal and state power.

  6. Dormant Commerce Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dormant_Commerce_Clause

    The approach began in the 1851 case of Cooley v. Board of Wardens, in which Justice Benjamin R. Curtis wrote for the Court: "Either absolutely to affirm, or deny that the nature of this [commerce] power requires exclusive legislation by Congress, is to lose sight of the nature of the subjects of this power, and to assert concerning all of them ...

  7. Warden School Board approves levy renewals

    www.aol.com/news/warden-school-board-approves...

    Oct. 30—WARDEN — The Warden School Board unanimously approved a motion Thursday to renew the district's educational programs and operations levy and its capital technology initiatives levy.

  8. ‘It changed the world.’ How a 1984 Supreme Court decision ...

    www.aol.com/news/changed-world-1984-supreme...

    “College football, I think, is in terrible trouble.” Andy Coats fought — and won — a 1984 Supreme Court case that gave college football television freedom. Now, it may lead to its demise.

  9. Benjamin Robbins Curtis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Robbins_Curtis

    His opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens 53 U.S. 299 (1852) [15] held that the Commerce Power as provided in the Commerce Clause, U.S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 3, extends to laws related to pilotage. State laws related to commerce powers can be valid so long as Congress is silent on the matter.