Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the Sixth Amendment standard for reversing convictions due to ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Read more:Column: Kari Lake talked smack about John McCain. Now she wants to take it back Now she wants to take it back Of course, the impresario of all the destruction and duplicity — Trump ...
A jury found the longtime politician guilty in a sprawling federal case involving a quid pro quo with USC. Replacing him won't be easy for Black L.A.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court, joined by Justices Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh. [9] The Court held that a "claim accrues when the plaintiff has the right to assert it in court—and in the case of the [Administrative Procedure Act], that is when the plaintiff is injured by final agency ...
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), is a landmark [2] [3] [4] United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court upheld Congress's power to enact most provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly called Obamacare, [5] [6] and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA), including a requirement for most ...
CHICAGO (AP) — An Illinois judge who sparked outrage by reversing a man’s rape conviction involving a 16-year-old girl has been removed from the bench after a judicial oversight body found he ...
However, this advice was incorrect, as Padilla's deportation was virtually automatic. [3] In 2004, Padilla filed a pro se motion for post-conviction relief, alleging that he had been given bad advice by his attorney. The Sixth Amendment, as interpreted by the Court in Gideon v. Wainwright, guarantees criminal defendants legal counsel. Strickland v.