When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    Cutting edge science is built on the foundation of previous research, and paradigms almost always change only slowly. Preliminary results, whether reported in the popular press, a conference abstract, or a peer-reviewed journal, are a form of anecdote and generally fall below the minimum requirements of reliable science sources.

  3. Invalid science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invalid_science

    Nature and related publications introduced an 18-point checklist for life science authors in May, [10] in its effort to ensure that its published research can be reproduced. Expanded "methods" sections and all data were to be available online. The Centre for Open Science opened as an independent laboratory focused on replication.

  4. Australian state and territory issued identity photo cards

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_state_and...

    Validity (years) Shows Sex Notes Cost Ref Australian Capital Territory: Proof of Identity Card: 18: Yes: No expiry: No: $7 [1] New South Wales: Photo card: 16: Yes: 5 or 10: No: 10 year validity if over 21 Variable [2] Northern Territory: Evidence of age card: 18: Yes: 5: No: $28 [3] Queensland: Photo identification card: 15: Yes: 10: No

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    Here's a checklist to help organize your evaluation of a source. Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement.

  6. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...

  7. Identity documents of Australia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_documents_of...

    At the request of police or security officers for legally valid purposes. Asserting that one is a responsible adult (generally 18 years or over) to: Access age restricted venues such as licensed premises, casinos, nightclubs or other gaming venues. Purchase of alcohol, tobacco, knives or aerosol based spray paint.

  8. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Checklist_of...

    The project traced its history to work done in the 1990s by Kew researcher Rafaël Govaerts on a checklist of the genus Quercus. Influenced by the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation, the project expanded. As of January 2013, 173 families of seed plants were included. [1]

  9. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consolidated_Standards_of...

    The main product of the CONSORT Group is the CONSORT Statement, [1] which is an evidence-based, minimum set of recommendations for reporting randomized trials.It offers a standard way for authors to prepare reports of trial findings, facilitating their complete and transparent reporting, reducing the influence of bias on their results, and aiding their critical appraisal and interpretation.