When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Dismissed as improvidently granted - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissed_as_improvidently...

    The Supreme Court normally DIGs a case through a per curiam decision, [a] usually without giving reasons, [2] but rather issuing a one-line decision: "The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted." However, justices sometimes file separate opinions, and the opinion of the Court may instead give reasons for the DIG.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 283

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 (1931), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the Court held that a California statute banning red flags was unconstitutional because it violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. In the case, Yetta Stromberg was convicted for displaying a red flag daily ...

  4. 1986 California Proposition 65 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_California_Proposition_65

    1986 protest against Proposition 65 California Proposition 65 warning before August 31, 2018 [2]. In 1986, political strategists including Tom Hayden and his wife, environmental activist Jane Fonda, thought that an initiative addressing toxic pollutants would bring more left leaning voters to the polls to help Democrat Tom Bradley in his gubernatorial race against incumbent Republican George ...

  5. Griffin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griffin_v._California

    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, by a 6–2 vote, that it is a violation of a defendant's Fifth Amendment rights for the prosecutor to comment to the jury on the defendant's declining to testify, or for the judge to instruct the jury that such silence is evidence of guilt.

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 285

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.) judgment affirmed Coombes v. Getz: 285 U.S. 434 (1932) Sutherland 6-3 none Cardozo (opinion; joined by Brandeis and Stone) certiorari to the California Supreme Court (Cal.) decree reversed United States v. Lefkowitz: 285 U.S. 452 (1932) Butler 8-0[a] none none

  7. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v...

    Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. [1]

  8. Southern California Gas Co. settles lawsuit alleging Prop. 65 ...

    www.aol.com/news/southern-california-gas-co...

    The Southern California Gas Co. settled a lawsuit stemming from the 2015 Aliso Canyon facility gas leak, the largest natural gas leak in U.S. history.

  9. Certiorari before judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certiorari_before_judgment

    A petition for certiorari before judgment, in the Supreme Court of the United States, is a petition for a writ of certiorari in which the Supreme Court is asked to immediately review the decision of a United States District Court, without an appeal having been decided by a United States Court of Appeals, for the purpose of expediting the proceedings and obtaining a final decision.