Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Procedural impropriety in Singapore administrative law is one of the three broad categories of judicial review, the other two being illegality and irrationality.A public authority commits procedural impropriety if it fails to properly observe either statutory procedural requirements, or common law rules of natural justice and fairness.
Proprietary estoppel is not a concept in American law, but a similar result is often reached under the general doctrine of promissory estoppel. Traditionally, proprietary estoppel arose in relation to rights to use the land of the owner, and possibly in connection with disputed transfers of ownership.
Singapore administrative law is largely based on English administrative law, which the nation inherited at independence in 1965. Claims for judicial review of administrative action may generally be brought under three well-established broad headings: illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety.
Collateral estoppel (CE), known in modern terminology as issue preclusion, is a common law estoppel doctrine that prevents a person from relitigating an issue. One summary is that, "once a court has decided an issue of fact or law necessary to its judgment, that decision ... preclude[s] relitigation of the issue in a suit on a different cause of action involving a party to the first case". [1]
Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Amendment) Act 2012; Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Act 2012; Economic Expansion Incentives (Relief from Income Tax) (Amendment) Act 2012; Employment of Foreign Manpower (Amendment) Act 2012; Energy Conservation Act 2012; Evidence (Amendment) Act 2012; Financial Advisers (Amendment) Act 2012
The rule of law in Singapore has been the topic of considerable disagreement and debate, in particular, as a result of differing conceptions of the doctrine. These conceptions of the rule of law can generally be divided into two categories: the "thin", or formal, conception; and the "thick", or substantive, conception.
Legal jurisdictions which provide for apparent authority include the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and South Africa.The doctrine of apparent authority is based on the concept of estoppel, thus, it prevents the principal from denying the existence of agency to a third party, provided that a representation, as to the agent's authority, has been made by him to the third ...
Estoppel forms part of the rules of equity, which were originally administered in the Chancery courts. Estoppel in English law is a doctrine that may be used in certain situations to prevent a person from relying upon certain rights, or upon a set of facts (e.g. words said or actions performed) which is different from an earlier set of facts.