When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: email privacy court cases in ohio free

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zauderer_v._Office_of...

    Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U.S. 626 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that states can require an advertiser to disclose certain information without violating the advertiser's First Amendment free speech protections as long as the disclosure requirements are reasonably related to the State's interest in ...

  3. Category:Supreme Court of Ohio cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Supreme_Court_of...

    This page was last edited on 15 January 2025, at 22:33 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

  4. Email privacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_privacy

    Email privacy [1] is a broad topic dealing with issues of unauthorized access to, and inspection of, electronic mail, or unauthorized tracking when a user reads an email. This unauthorized access can happen while an email is in transit, as well as when it is stored on email servers or on a user's computer, or when the user reads the message.

  5. Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_Civil_Rights...

    Seal of the Ohio Civil Rights Commission. Linda Hoskinson was hired as an elementary school teacher at Dayton Christian Schools during the 1978-1979 school year. Her employment contract required following a "biblical chain of command" [3] [4] in lieu of using the state legal system and a signed statement of faith. [5]

  6. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohralik_v._Ohio_State_Bar...

    Ohio State Bar Association, 436 US 447 (1978), [1] was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that in-person solicitation of clients by lawyers was not protected speech under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

  7. Katz v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katz_v._United_States

    The Court began by dismissing the parties' characterization of the case in terms of a traditional trespass-based analysis that hinged on, first, whether the public telephone booth Katz had used was a "constitutionally protected area" where he had a "right of privacy"; and second, on whether the FBI had "physically penetrated" the protected area ...

  8. Ohio Courts of Common Pleas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_Courts_of_Common_Pleas

    Each of Ohio's 88 counties has a court of common pleas. The Ohio General Assembly (the state legislature) has the power to divide courts of common pleas into divisions, and has done so, establishing general, domestic relations, juvenile, and probate divisions: General divisions have original jurisdiction in all criminal felony cases, all civil ...

  9. State v. Dalton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_v._Dalton

    State v. Dalton, 153 Ohio App.3d 286 (2003), is a legal case in the U.S. state of Ohio involving the prosecution of a man for recording fictional tales of alleged child pornography in a diary. The case received wide publicity because of the private nature of a diary and a novel application of state child pornography laws. [citation needed]