When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Warburg hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warburg_hypothesis

    Scientist Otto Warburg, whose research activities led to the formulation of the Warburg hypothesis for explaining the root cause of cancer.. The Warburg hypothesis (/ ˈ v ɑːr b ʊər ɡ /), sometimes known as the Warburg theory of cancer, postulates that the driver of carcinogenesis (cancer formation) is insufficient cellular respiration caused by insult (damage) to mitochondria. [1]

  3. Warburg effect (oncology) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warburg_effect_(oncology)

    Otto Warburg postulated this change in metabolism is the fundamental cause of cancer, [8] a claim now known as the Warburg hypothesis. Today, mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are thought to be responsible for malignant transformation, and the Warburg effect is considered to be a result of these mutations rather than a cause. [9 ...

  4. Genotoxicity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genotoxicity

    Genotoxicity is the property of chemical agents that damage the genetic information within a cell causing mutations, which may lead to cancer.While genotoxicity is often confused with mutagenicity, all mutagens are genotoxic, but some genotoxic substances are not mutagenic.

  5. Carcinogenesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carcinogenesis

    The central role of DNA damage and epigenetic defects in DNA repair genes in carcinogenesis. DNA damage is considered to be the primary cause of cancer. [17] More than 60,000 new naturally-occurring instances of DNA damage arise, on average, per human cell, per day, due to endogenous cellular processes (see article DNA damage (naturally occurring)).

  6. Peto's paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peto's_paradox

    Peto's paradox is the observation that, at the species level, the incidence of cancer does not appear to correlate with the number of cells in an organism. [1] For example, the incidence of cancer in humans is much higher than the incidence of cancer in whales, [2] despite whales having more cells than humans.

  7. Malignant transformation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malignant_transformation

    Colon cancer provides one example of the mechanisms by which diet, the top factor listed in the table, is an external factor in cancer. The Western diet of African Americans in the United States is associated with a yearly colon cancer rate of 65 per 100,000 individuals, while the high fiber/low fat diet of rural Native Africans in South Africa is associated with a yearly colon cancer rate of ...

  8. Study: 21 popular cereals found to have cancer-linked ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/study-21-popular-cereals...

    The World Health Organization has identified glyphosate as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" and a study published earlier this year showed that glyphosate raised the cancer risk of those exposed ...

  9. DNA adduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_adduct

    Human consumption of more than 2.5–3.5 oz (70–100 g) of red meat (beef, lamb or pork) a day increases the risk of colon cancer, but eating chicken does not have this risk. [ 21 ] [ 22 ] The increased risk of colon cancer from red meat may be due to higher increases in DNA adducts from digestion of red meat.