Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Elect. Corp. is a key United States legal case from 1961 in trademark infringement law. It is also cited in personality rights particularly around celebrities. The decision argued that trademark infringement is measured by the multi-factor "likelihood of confusion" test. That is, a new mark will infringe on an existing ...
Polaroid Corporation was an American company best known for its instant film and cameras, ... In the two years that followed the lawsuit, total sales of instant ...
For example, in Fonovisa, Inc. v. Cherry Auction, Inc., [29] the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit imposed secondary liability on a flea market landlord who provided the “necessary marketplace” for the sale of infringing goods. The court held that contributory trademark infringement existed because the landlord was ...
Car rental company Enterprise Fleet Management, the world’s largest vehicle fleet operator, dropped its lawsuit this summer against the town of Mooresville, a police detective and auto dealer ...
A gender discrimination lawsuit first filed against Microsoft in 2015 could get new life. The Ninth Circuit court of appeals on Thursday said it will reconsider a lower court ruling denying the ...
A National Beverage (NASDAQ:FIZZ) lawsuit is accusing the parent company of LaCroix of making unsubstantial claims regarding the safety of its sparkling water cans, which may be more harmful than ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file
Polaroid marketers incorrectly guessed that the camera and film would remain in stock long enough to manufacture a second run based on customer demand. All fifty-seven cameras and all of the film were sold on the first day of demonstrations. During his time at Polaroid, Land was notorious for his marathon research sessions.