Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Concerned editors should give article watchers two to three weeks to respond to concerns before nominating the article for Featured article review. During this step, articles are not yet listed on this page (but they can be added to Wikipedia:Featured article review/notices given, and removed from there once posted here). 2. Featured article ...
Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at featured article review. On non-mobile versions of our website, a small bronze star icon on the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is featured. On most smartphones and tablets you can also select "Desktop" at the very bottom of ...
An A-class article is often considered as a transition between good article and featured article status. It was originally created to serve as a buffer between B-class and featured article, though now it saw limited use by some large Wikiprojects. An example is the Battle of Nam River and its review in June 2014.
Preprint server with integrated option of peer review by invited experts, suggested by the authors, done openly after publication >1,000 2012 F1000 Research Ltd. FocUS Archive: Ultrasound research A free preprint service for the focused ultrasound research community <100 2018 Center for Open Science: Frenxiv: Multidisciplinary: French server ...
People are "too free" when they become irresponsible, anti-social and arbitrary, i.e., when they fail to regulate their own behaviour appropriately, and have to be regulated by others. Liberal criticism is therefore always very concerned with finding the right kind of balance , or the right nuance , which would (ideally) express a situation of ...
Any article devoted solely to announcing that someone is gay, lesbian, a man, a woman, married, divorced or in other words, soap opera of any kind (see Friends of gays should not be allowed to edit articles). Any article that calls any Wikipedian the worst ever. See WP:NPA and WP:ATP. Any article about another article.
Choose an article that you would like to review. Start the review by following the start review link appearing on the GA nominations page or near the top of the article talk page. A new GA review page will be created. You may add opening remarks, an initial review, or one of these templates to the bottom of this review page. [g] Save the page.
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 22 February 2025. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ...