When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

    District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms—unconnected with service in a militia—for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and ...

  3. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle...

    In a second case, the Supreme Court of Hawaii upheld a state requirement for having a permit to carry a gun in public, ruling that the recent decision of Bruen and other gun rights cases by the U.S. Supreme Court since Heller have turned against the "militia-centric" reading of the Second Amendment, and that "states retain the authority to ...

  4. Explainer: What the Supreme Court gun ruling means for ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-gun-ruling-means...

    What the Supreme Court ruling clearing NYers to legally carry guns means. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us. Sign in. Mail. 24/7 ...

  5. Supreme Court rules ban on gun bump stocks is unlawful - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-gun-bump...

    The Supreme Court has backed gun rights in cases directly addressing the scope of the Second Amendment, including the 2022 ruling that found there is a right to carry a handgun outside the home.

  6. McDonald v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago

    McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), was a landmark [1] decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that found that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms", as protected under the Second Amendment, is incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment and is thereby enforceable against the states.

  7. Explainer-What changes after the U.S. Supreme Court's ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/explainer-changes-u-supreme...

    The ruling makes it much more difficult for U.S. lawmakers to regulate guns and other weapons in a way other countries can, and easier for the National Rifle Association and other pro-gun groups ...

  8. Supreme Court to review Trump-era ban on gun 'bump stocks' - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-review-trump-era...

    The court, with its new 6-3 conservative majority, ruled for the first time in the June 2022 gun rights decision that the right to bear arms under the Constitution’s Second Amendment protects an ...

  9. Garland v. Cargill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garland_v._Cargill

    Garland v. Cargill, 602 U.S. 406 (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the classification of bump stocks as "machine guns" under the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA) by the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) in 2018.