Ad
related to: non constructive proof example in literature analysis essay outline
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
However, there is a non-constructive proof that shows that linkedness is decidable in polynomial time. The proof relies on the following facts: The set of graphs for which the answer is "yes" is closed under taking minors. I. e., if a graph G can be embedded linklessly in 3-d space, then every minor of G can also be embedded linklessly.
The above proof is an example of a non-constructive proof disallowed by intuitionists: The proof is non-constructive because it doesn't give specific numbers a {\\displaystyle a} and b {\\displaystyle b} that satisfy the theorem but only two separate possibilities, one of which must work.
The following famous example of a nonconstructive proof shows that there exist two irrational numbers a and b such that is a rational number. This proof uses that 2 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}} is irrational (an easy proof is known since Euclid ), but not that 2 2 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}^{\sqrt {2}}} is irrational (this is true, but the proof ...
Mathematical proof. Direct proof; Reductio ad absurdum; Proof by exhaustion; Constructive proof; Nonconstructive proof; Tautology; Consistency proof; Arithmetization of analysis; Foundations of mathematics; Formal language; Principia Mathematica; Hilbert's program; Impredicative; Definable real number; Algebraic logic. Boolean algebra (logic ...
Such a proof is again a refutation by contradiction. A typical example is the proof of the proposition "there is no smallest positive rational number": assume there is a smallest positive rational number q and derive a contradiction by observing that q / 2 is even smaller than q and still positive.
As is often the case with probabilistic arguments, this theorem is nonconstructive and gives no method of determining an explicit element of the probability space in which no event occurs. However, algorithmic versions of the local lemma with stronger preconditions are also known (Beck 1991; Czumaj and Scheideler 2000).
(which holds, for example, for n = 5 and r = 4), there must exist a coloring in which there are no monochromatic r-subgraphs. [a] By definition of the Ramsey number, this implies that R(r, r) must be bigger than n. In particular, R(r, r) must grow at least exponentially with r. A weakness of this argument is that it is entirely nonconstructive.
From the other direction, there has been considerable clarification of what constructive mathematics is—without the emergence of a 'master theory'. For example, according to Errett Bishop's definitions, the continuity of a function such as sin(x) should be proved as a constructive bound on the modulus of continuity, meaning that the existential content of the assertion of continuity is a ...