Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The source reliability is rated between A (history of complete reliability) to E (history of invalid information), with F for source without sufficient history to establish reliability level. The information content is rated between 1 (confirmed) to 5 (improbable), with 6 for information whose reliability can not be evaluated. [6]
[1] Another type of corroborating evidence comes from using the Baconian method , i.e., the method of agreement , method of difference , and method of concomitant variations . These methods are followed in experimental design .
The importance of corroboration is unique to Scots criminal law. [1] A long-standing feature of Scots law, the requirement for corroborating evidence means at least two independent sources of evidence are required in support of each crucial fact before an accused can be convicted of a crime. [2]
Accuracy is also used as a statistical measure of how well a binary classification test correctly identifies or excludes a condition. That is, the accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions (both true positives and true negatives) among the total number of cases examined. [10]
Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements, in the law of evidence, occur where a witness, testifying at trial, makes a statement that is either consistent or inconsistent, respectively, with a previous statement given at an earlier time such as during a discovery, interview, or interrogation.
[5] Both United States and International auditing standards include guidance related to financial statement assertions, although the specific assertions differ. The PCAOB and the IFAC address this topic in AS 1105 [6] (updated from AS 15 [7] as of December 31, 2016) and ISA 315, respectively. [4]
Individual states can provide more rights under their own laws than the Federal Constitution requires. At least six states — Alaska, [SL 1] Hawaii, [SL 2] Massachusetts, [SL 3] New York, [SL 4] Vermont [SL 5] and Washington [SL 6] — have rejected the Gates rationale and have retained the two-prong Aguilar–Spinelli test on independent ...
"The value for which P = .05, or 1 in 20, is 1.96 or nearly 2; it is convenient to take this point as a limit in judging whether a deviation is to be considered significant or not." [11] In Table 1 of the same work, he gave the more precise value 1.959964. [12] In 1970, the value truncated to 20 decimal places was calculated to be