Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In patent law, a disclaimer identifies, in a claim, subject-matter that is not claimed. [2] By extension, a disclaimer may also mean the action of introducing a negative limitation in a claim, i.e. "an amendment to a claim resulting in the incorporation therein of a "negative" technical feature, typically excluding from a general feature specific embodiments or areas". [3]
use wikipedia at your own risk Please be aware that any information you may find in Wikipedia may be inaccurate, misleading, dangerous, unethical, or illegal. Some information on Wikipedia may create an unreasonable risk for readers who choose to apply or use the information in their own activities, or to promote the information for use by ...
Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer: Wikipedia does not give legal opinions; Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer: Wikipedia does not give medical advice; Wikipedia:Risk disclaimer: Use Wikipedia at your own risk; Wikipedia:Survey disclaimer: Wikipedia has some rights when you participate in one of their survey
All published derivative works must use exactly the same license as the original: if you use the work, you're forced to use the same license for your own original work as well. If your work is using a different license, you can't use the copyleft license, even if your work is also using a (different) copyleft licence. If you don't want to ...
A disclaimer may be added to mitigate the risk that a confidential email may be forwarded to a third-party recipient. Organizations may use the disclaimer to warn such recipients that they are not authorised recipients and to ask that they delete the email. The legal force and standing of such warnings is not well-established. [4] [5]
An example of a copyright waiver is the following: The author of this work hereby waives all claim of copyright (economic and moral) in this work and immediately places it in the public domain; it may be used, distorted or destroyed in any manner whatsoever without further attribution or notice to the creator.
I'm entitled to my opinion (or I have a right to my opinion) is an informal fallacy in which someone dismisses arguments against their position as an attack on one's right to hold their own particular viewpoint. [1] [2] The statement exemplifies a red herring or thought-terminating cliché.
Wikipedia's current policy is to include such content, provided it breaches neither any of our existing policies (especially Neutral point of view) nor the laws of the United States, where Wikipedia is hosted. See a list of controversial issues for some examples of articles that may contain such content. None of these articles contain warnings.