When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Texas Advance Directives Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Advance_Directives_Act

    SB 439 is also known as the "Patient and Family Treatment Choice Rights Act of 2007" and would amend the applicable provisions of the Advance Directives Act to "ensure that, when an attending physician is unwilling to respect a patient's advance directive or a patient's or family's decision to choose the treatment necessary to prevent the ...

  3. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Texas...

    Case history; Prior: 674 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2012); rehearing en banc denied, 688 F.3d 211 (5th Cir. 2012); cert. granted, 568 U.S. 1140 (2013).: Holding; A plaintiff establishes a violation of the retaliation provision of Title VII if the plaintiff proves that the defendant would not have made the adverse employment action but for the defendant's retaliatory motive.

  4. Mixed-member proportional representation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed-member_proportional...

    In German, this localized list system now shares the name of PPR with the mixed systems still used in the federal states of Germany that are referred to as MMP in English. In English, due to this change, the system is no longer considered to be MMP in the sense of a mixed member system combining proportional and district-level first-pas-the ...

  5. Medicare Advantage disenrollment

    www.aol.com/medicare-advantage-disenrollment...

    Disenrollment is not required in these cases, as private medical insurance companies administer Medigap plans, and as such, are held separately to original Medicare. The best time to sign up for a ...

  6. Addington v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addington_v._Texas

    Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that set the standard for involuntary commitment for treatment by raising the burden of proof required to commit persons for psychiatric treatment from the usual civil burden of proof of "preponderance of the evidence" to "clear and convincing evidence".

  7. Hopwood v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopwood_v._Texas

    Faculty and students protested. For the next several years, the case was a popular topic of discussion and debate in The Daily Texan, the University's student newspaper. The Texas legislature passed the Top Ten Percent Rule governing admissions into public colleges in the state, partly in order to mitigate some of the effects of the Hopwood ...

  8. US Supreme Court grapples with Texas online porn age ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/texas-online-porn-age...

    The Supreme Court last year declined to halt enforcement of the law while the case proceeded. Its ruling is expected by the end of June. (Reporting by Andrew Chung and John Kruzel; Editing by Will ...

  9. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Reasoning that if commitment is for treatment and betterment of individuals, it must be accompanied by adequate treatment, several lower courts recognized a due process right 14th 1979 Addington v. Texas: Raised the burden of proof requirement, in order to civilly commit a person, from preponderance, to clear and convincing.