When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hurst v. Florida - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurst_v._Florida

    Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. 92 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court, in an 8–1 ruling, applied the rule of Ring v. Arizona [1] to the Florida capital sentencing scheme, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty.

  3. Capital punishment in Florida - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Florida

    Florida statute also provides the death penalty for capital drug trafficking and discharging or using a destructive device causing death. A provision for capital sexual battery was found unconstitutional in the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case Kennedy v. Louisiana. No one is on death row in the United States for drug trafficking.

  4. Hall v. Florida - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hall_v._Florida

    Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. 701 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a bright-line IQ threshold requirement for determining whether someone has an intellectual disability (formerly mental retardation) is unconstitutional in deciding whether they are eligible for the death penalty.

  5. TALLAHASSEE — Pointing to a “medical consensus” about Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, attorneys for inmate Michael Duane Zack on Sunday urged the Florida Supreme Court to block his scheduled Oct. 3 ...

  6. DeSantis weakens Florida death-penalty rules after Parkland ...

    www.aol.com/desantis-weakens-florida-death...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Could people facing the death penalty lose the right to tell ...

    www.aol.com/news/could-people-facing-death...

    The Marshall Project reports on the evolving perception and status of the right for death penalty defendants to present mitigating evidence that could sway a jury.

  8. Participation of medical professionals in American executions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participation_of_medical...

    Board secretary Mark A. Rockoff defended the organization's policy, stating that participation in executions "puts anesthesiologists in an untenable position," and that physicians "can assuredly provide effective anesthesia, but doing so in order to cause a patient's death is a violation of their fundamental duty as physicians to do no harm."

  9. List of United States Supreme Court opinions involving ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Harris, 465 U.S. 37 (1984) — A state appellate court, before it affirms a death sentence, is not required to compare the sentence in the case before it with the penalties imposed in similar cases if requested to do so by the prisoner. Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149 (1990) — Mandatory appellate review is not required in death penalty cases.