Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Republican Party of Minnesota v. White , 536 U.S. 765 (2002), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the First Amendment rights of candidates for judicial office. In a 5–4 decision, the court ruled that Minnesota's announce clause, which forbade candidates for judicial office from announcing their views on disputed ...
Republican Party of Minnesota v. White; S. Smiley v. Holm This page was last edited on 21 February 2012, at 22:09 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons ...
The party was fined $170,000 for violating federal campaign finance regulations from 2003 to 2008. [4] The Chairman of the Minnesota Republican Party Tony Sutton (R) was found guilty of circumventing Finance Laws in the Gubernatorial Election Recount of 2010 and fined $33,000. (2010) [5] [6] The last Republican Governor of Minnesota was Tim ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Minnesota Board for Community Colleges v. Knight, 465 U.S. 271 (1984) , was a collective bargaining rights case brought before the United States Supreme Court . The decision had effects on how the First Amendment to the United States Constitution is interpreted.
US Rep. Tom Emmer, the House majority whip who withdrew his bid for the speakership after it was thrown into immediate jeopardy Tuesday afternoon, has tried to balance an at-times moderate voting ...
A former NBA player running for Senate with the support of Minnesota’s statewide Republican Party attacked the media in an interview as a reporter pressed him to answer why his Federal Election ...
Davis v. Federal Election Commission, 554 U.S. 724 (2008), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that section 319 (popularly known as the "Millionaire's Amendment") of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (popularly known as the McCain-Feingold law) unconstitutionally infringed on candidates' rights as provided by First Amendment.