When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Linear separability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_separability

    However, not all sets of four points, no three collinear, are linearly separable in two dimensions. The following example would need two straight lines and thus is not linearly separable: Notice that three points which are collinear and of the form "+ ⋅⋅⋅ — ⋅⋅⋅ +" are also not linearly separable.

  3. Separable state - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separable_state

    In the special case of pure states the definition simplifies: a pure state is separable if and only if it is a product state. A state is said to be entangled if it is not separable. In general, determining if a state is separable is not straightforward and the problem is classed as NP-hard.

  4. Anderson–Kadec theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson–Kadec_theorem

    In the argument below denotes an infinite-dimensional separable Fréchet space and the relation of topological equivalence (existence of homeomorphism). A starting point of the proof of the Anderson–Kadec theorem is Kadec's proof that any infinite-dimensional separable Banach space is homeomorphic to R N . {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{\mathbb ...

  5. Separation of variables - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_variables

    This equation is an equation only of y'' and y', meaning it is reducible to the general form described above and is, therefore, separable. Since it is a second-order separable equation, collect all x variables on one side and all y' variables on the other to get: (′) (′) =.

  6. Multipartite entanglement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multipartite_entanglement

    For a pure state, which is k-producible, but not ()-producible and is h-separable, but not (+)-separable, the strechability is . [3] [4] [5] The definition can be extended to mixed states in the usual manner. One can define further properties based on the partitioning of particles into groups, which have extensively been studied.

  7. Splitting field - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_field

    The splitting field of x 2 + 1 over F 7 is F 49; the polynomial has no roots in F 7, i.e., −1 is not a square there, because 7 is not congruent to 1 modulo 4. [3] The splitting field of x 2 − 1 over F 7 is F 7 since x 2 − 1 = (x + 1)(x − 1) already splits into linear factors. We calculate the splitting field of f(x) = x 3 + x + 1 over F 2.

  8. W state - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_state

    This difference is, for example, illustrated by the following interesting property of the W state: if one of the three qubits is lost, the state of the remaining 2-qubit system is still entangled. This robustness of W-type entanglement contrasts strongly with the GHZ state, which is fully separable after loss of one qubit.

  9. Separable polynomial - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separable_polynomial

    Separable polynomials are used to define separable extensions: A field extension K ⊂ L is a separable extension if and only if for every α in L which is algebraic over K, the minimal polynomial of α over K is a separable polynomial. Inseparable extensions (that is, extensions which are not separable) may occur only in positive characteristic.