When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shelby County v. Holder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_County_v._Holder

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4 ...

  3. Constitutionality of the National Popular Vote Interstate ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutionality_of_the...

    National Popular Vote Inc. disputes that a constitutional amendment is necessary for altering the current method of electing the President because the NPVIC would not abolish the Electoral College, [89] and because states would only be using the plenary power to choose the method by which they appoint their electors that is already delegated to ...

  4. Arrow's impossibility theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow's_impossibility_theorem

    Thus, Condorcet proved a weaker form of Arrow's impossibility theorem long before Arrow, under the stronger assumption that a voting system in the two-candidate case will agree with a simple majority vote. [20] Unlike pluralitarian rules such as ranked-choice runoff (RCV) or first-preference plurality, [6] Condorcet methods avoid the spoiler ...

  5. The Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that voting is not a ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/kansas-supreme-court-ruled...

    Election laws had been fairly constant since the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act by Congress, Shew said. But that changed in 2013, when the U.S. Supreme Court tossed out a key provision of ...

  6. Independent state legislature theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_state...

    The independent state legislature theory or independent state legislature doctrine (ISL) is a judicially rejected legal theory that posits that the Constitution of the United States delegates authority to regulate federal elections within a state to that state's elected lawmakers without any checks and balances from state constitutions, state courts, governors, ballot initiatives, or other ...

  7. Article Four of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Four_of_the_United...

    In 1864, during the Civil War, an effort to repeal this clause of the Constitution failed. The vote in the House was 69 for repeal and 38 against, which was short of the two-to-one vote required to amend the Constitution. [5] This clause was rendered mostly moot when the Thirteenth Amendment abolished involuntary servitude.

  8. Hurricane Helene has already upended the election in North Carolina, where the General Assembly unanimously passed special voting rules after the disaster to make it easier for 1.3 million ...

  9. Popular sovereignty in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_sovereignty_in_the...

    Popular sovereignty is the principle that the leaders of a state and its government are created and sustained by the consent of its people, who are the source of all political legitimacy. Citizens may unite and offer to delegate a portion of their sovereign powers and duties to those who wish to serve as officers of the state, contingent on the ...