Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In Windows Vista, GINA is replaced by Credential Providers; however, they do not support programmatic initiation of fast user switching. [6] In Windows XP, fast user switching was unavailable if the computer is on a Windows Server domain network or if Offline Files was enabled. Windows Vista and later no longer have these restrictions. [7]
Windows Server 2003 Support Tools includes 70 different tools. [3] For instance, WinDiff is a GUI tool for comparing files and folders. [ 4 ] [ 5 ] NetDiag is a CLI tool for diagnosing network problems. [ 6 ]
Windows XP has been criticized for its vulnerabilities due to buffer overflows and its susceptibility to malware such as viruses, trojan horses, and worms.Nicholas Petreley for The Register notes that "Windows XP was the first version of Windows to reflect a serious effort to isolate users from the system, so that users each have their own private files and limited system privileges."
Because of the name, however, it was speculated that the key would allow the United States National Security Agency (NSA) to subvert any Windows user's security. Microsoft denied the speculation and said that the key's name came from the fact that NSA was the technical review authority for U.S. cryptography export controls .
The user-profiling scheme in force today owes its origins to Windows NT, which stored its profiles within the system folder itself, typically under C:\WINNT\Profiles\. Windows 2000 saw the change to a separate "Documents and Settings" folder for profiles, and in this respect is virtually identical to Windows XP and Windows Server 2003.
Set of enhanced security features, included in Windows XP Service Pack 2. [33] Lonestar — Windows XP Tablet PC Edition 2005 — [34] Whistler Server Windows 2002 Server, Windows .NET Server, Windows .NET Server 2003 Windows Server 2003 — [35] [36] Bobcat — Windows Small Business Server 2003 Not to be confused with Microsoft Bob. [37 ...
Users must download the utilities and SDK separately. However, the server components from the SFU product line (namely Server for NFS, User Name Mapping, Server for NIS, Password Synchronization etc.) are not included [13] – these are included in Server editions of Windows (i.e. Windows Server 2008).
Some performance improvements could be seen in memory management and graphics display, but other parts of OS have equal or lower performance than Windows XP. On a low-end computer system, Windows XP outperformed Windows Vista in most tested areas. Windows OS network performance depends on the packet size and used protocol. However, in general ...