Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Cramér–Rao bound is stated in this section for several increasingly general cases, beginning with the case in which the parameter is a scalar and its estimator is unbiased. All versions of the bound require certain regularity conditions, which hold for most well-behaved distributions.
His other contributions include the Fisher–Rao theorem, Rao distance, and orthogonal arrays. He was the author of 15 books [ 11 ] and authored over 400 journal publications. Rao received 38 honorary doctoral degrees from universities in 19 countries around the world and numerous awards and medals for his contributions to statistics and science.
The quantum Cramér–Rao bound is the quantum analogue of the classical Cramér–Rao bound. It bounds the achievable precision in parameter estimation with a quantum system: It bounds the achievable precision in parameter estimation with a quantum system:
The Cramér–Rao bound [9] [10] states that the inverse of the Fisher information is a lower bound on the variance of any unbiased estimator of θ. Van Trees (1968) and Frieden (2004) provide the following method of deriving the Cramér–Rao bound, a result which describes use of the Fisher information.
The accuracy can be calculated by using the Cramér–Rao bound and taking account of the above factors in its formulation. Additionally, a configuration of the sensors that minimizes a metric obtained from the Cramér–Rao bound can be chosen so as to optimize the actual position estimation of the target in a region of interest. [6]
At the time of Cramer's heartfelt apology, Meta shares were trading at around $100. Today, the stock stands at $367, marking a gain of around 267%.
In statistics, efficiency is a measure of quality of an estimator, of an experimental design, [1] or of a hypothesis testing procedure. [2] Essentially, a more efficient estimator needs fewer input data or observations than a less efficient one to achieve the Cramér–Rao bound.
The Cramer-Rao inequality gives the maximum accuracy that can be achieved. Later, we speak about variance and there it is in fact a lower bound. High variance means low accuracy and vice versa.