Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
You can also put in the ISBN, co-author names, page numbers and such; see citing sources. That's it! You're done. When editing, you'll see your reference next to the text; but after saving, readers will only see a reference number there; your reference should appear below. Good luck!
Other reliable sources include university textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and news coverage (not opinions) from mainstream newspapers. Self-published media, where the author and publisher are the same, are usually not acceptable as sources. These can include newsletters, personal websites, press ...
Citing the ICMJE that "all participants in the peer-review and publication process must disclose all relationships that could be viewed as potential conflicts of interest", it highly recommends COI disclosure for sponsors, authors, reviewers, journals, and editorial staff. [8]
xkcd webcomic titled "Wikipedian Protester". The sign says: "[CITATION NEEDED]".[1]A citation is a reference to a source. More precisely, a citation is an abbreviated alphanumeric expression embedded in the body of an intellectual work that denotes an entry in the bibliographic references section of the work for the purpose of acknowledging the relevance of the works of others to the topic of ...
The system of IPCC citation developed here uses short-cites created by the {{}} template to link to a source's full citation. This is not a "parenthetical referencing" system, as the short-cites used here 1) do not require use of parentheses 2) nor inclusion in the text (although those are permitted if an editor so chooses), 3) nor do they use the "author-date" convention of identifying the ...
Five references are provided early on: two textbooks, a specialized monograph on aldol reactions, and two review articles. Most readers would assume that the bulk of the statements in the comparatively short Wikipedia article could be verified by checking any of these references, and so it may only be necessary to provide additional in-line references for controversial statements, for recent ...
An exception, to many scientific and technical editors, is when we cite a peer-reviewed literature review and also cite some of the original research papers the review covers. This is often felt to provide better utility for academic and university-student users of Wikipedia, and improved verifiability of details, especially in medical topics .
This is part of the standard peer review process and meant to improve the paper. Coercive citation, on the other hand, is a specific unethical business practice in which the editor asks the author to add citations to papers published in the very same journal ( self-citation ) and in particular to cite papers that the author regards as duplicate ...