When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: case law every cop should know

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Kingsley v. Hendrickson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingsley_v._Hendrickson

    Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 576 U.S. 389 (2015), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held in a 5–4 decision that a pretrial detainee must prove only that force used by police is excessive according to an objective standard, not that a police officer was subjectively aware that the force used was unreasonable.

  3. Pennsylvania v. Mimms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_v._Mimms

    Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977), is a United States Supreme Court criminal law decision holding that a police officer ordering a person out of a car following a traffic stop and conducting a pat-down to check for weapons did not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  4. Warren v. District of Columbia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

    Warren v. District of Columbia [1] (444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981) is a District of Columbia Court of Appeals case that held that the police do not owe a specific duty to provide police services to specific citizens based on the public duty doctrine.

  5. Tennessee v. Garner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_v._Garner

    Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the ...

  6. Rhode Island v. Innis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhode_Island_v._Innis

    Case history; Prior: Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Rhode Island: Holding; Interrogation under Miranda is defined as any words or actions on the part of the police that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response. Court membership; Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Associate Justices William J. Brennan Jr ...

  7. A Cop's Corruption Allegedly Cost an Innocent Man 2 ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/cops-corruption-allegedly-cost...

    That is especially true in the case of qualified immunity, Reeves notes, as lawmakers already expressly decided what should happen in such cases. It is not a mystery. They enshrined it into law a ...

  8. Heien v. North Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heien_v._North_Carolina

    Heien v. North Carolina, 574 U.S. 54 (2014), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, ruling that a police officer's reasonable mistake of law can provide the individualized suspicion required by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution to justify a traffic stop. The Court delivered its ruling on December 15, 2014.

  9. Georgia prosecutors committed 'gross negligence' with emails ...

    www.aol.com/news/georgia-prosecutors-committed...

    A Georgia judge chastised state prosecutors Wednesday for mishandling confidential emails between a defense attorney and three Atlanta activists who face racketeering charges connected to violent ...