When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Accessory (legal term) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_(legal_term)

    Note that under s. 21(2), the words "ought to have known" indicating objective knowledge have been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada in cases where the principal offence requires subjective foresight of the consequences, such as murder (R v Logan, [1990] 2 SCR 731).

  3. Murder in Pennsylvania law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_in_Pennsylvania_law

    In the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, common law felony murder was codified as "Murder of the Second Degree." [3] The statute provides that "[c]riminal homicide constitutes murder of the second degree when it is committed while defendant was engaged as a principal or an accomplice in the perpetration of a felony." [3]

  4. Commonwealth v. Malone - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_v._Malone

    Malone, 354 Pa. 180, 47 A.2d 445 (1946), [1] was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that affirmed the conviction of a teenager for second degree murder. The teenagers had played a modified version of Russian roulette called Russian Poker, in which they took turns aiming and pulling the trigger of a revolver at each other ...

  5. Survivalist sentenced to death for murder of PA state trooper

    www.aol.com/article/news/2017/04/27/survivalist...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_v._Abu-Jamal

    The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania sought to reinstate the sentence of death, on the basis that Yohn's ruling was flawed, as he should have deferred to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court which had already ruled on the issue of sentencing, and the Batson claim was invalid because Abu-Jamal made no complaints during the original jury selection.

  7. Pa. Supreme Court: Gun violence a serious issue, but local ...

    www.aol.com/pa-supreme-court-gun-violence...

    “There is also no doubt that a serious problem exists ... relative to gun violence and its impacts on our citizenry,” Justice Kevin Brobson wrote.

  8. United States v. Knotts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Knotts

    United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of an electronic surveillance device. [1] The defendants argued that the use of this device was a Fourth Amendment violation. The device in question was described as a beeper that could only be tracked from a short distance.

  9. Murder trial date bumped to 2024 - AOL

    www.aol.com/murder-trial-date-bumped-2024...

    Aug. 17—CATLETTSBURG — A new trial date has been set for a 22-year-old accused of murder after his attorney retired two months before a jury trial was set to begin. Taylon Bensinger, of ...