When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. General Leibniz rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Leibniz_rule

    The proof of the general Leibniz rule [2]: 68–69 proceeds by induction. Let f {\displaystyle f} and g {\displaystyle g} be n {\displaystyle n} -times differentiable functions. The base case when n = 1 {\displaystyle n=1} claims that: ( f g ) ′ = f ′ g + f g ′ , {\displaystyle (fg)'=f'g+fg',} which is the usual product rule and is known ...

  3. Characterizations of the exponential function - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Characterizations_of_the...

    Toggle Proof that each characterization makes sense subsection. 3.1 Characterization 1. 3.2 Characterization 2. ... = 1 and the definition of the derivative as ...

  4. Leibniz integral rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz_integral_rule

    In calculus, the Leibniz integral rule for differentiation under the integral sign, named after Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, states that for an integral of the form () (,), where < (), < and the integrands are functions dependent on , the derivative of this integral is expressible as (() (,)) = (, ()) (, ()) + () (,) where the partial derivative indicates that inside the integral, only the ...

  5. Exponential integral - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_integral

    with the derivative evaluated at = Another connexion with the confluent hypergeometric functions is that E 1 is an exponential times the function U(1,1,z): = (,,) The exponential integral is closely related to the logarithmic integral function li(x) by the formula

  6. Product rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_rule

    The proof is by mathematical induction on the exponent n. If n = 0 then x n is constant and nx n − 1 = 0. The rule holds in that case because the derivative of a constant function is 0.

  7. Quotient rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotient_rule

    2.1 Proof from derivative definition and limit properties. 2.2 Proof using implicit differentiation. 2.3 Proof using the reciprocal rule or chain rule.

  8. Derivative - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative

    The derivative of ′ is the second derivative, denoted as ⁠ ″ ⁠, and the derivative of ″ is the third derivative, denoted as ⁠ ‴ ⁠. By continuing this process, if it exists, the ⁠ n {\displaystyle n} ⁠ th derivative is the derivative of the ⁠ ( n − 1 ) {\displaystyle (n-1)} ⁠ th derivative or the derivative of order ...

  9. Notation for differentiation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notation_for_differentiation

    for the first derivative, for the second derivative, for the third derivative, and for the nth derivative. When f is a function of several variables, it is common to use "∂", a stylized cursive lower-case d, rather than "D". As above, the subscripts denote the derivatives that are being taken.