Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In philosophy, proving too much is a logical fallacy which occurs when an argument reaches the desired conclusion in such a way as to make that conclusion only a special case or corollary consequence of a larger, obviously absurd conclusion. It is a fallacy because, if the reasoning were valid, it would hold for the absurd conclusion.
Proving too much – an argument that results in an overly generalized conclusion (e.g.: arguing that drinking alcohol is bad because in some instances it has led to spousal or child abuse). Psychologist's fallacy – an observer presupposes the objectivity of their own perspective when analyzing a behavioral event.
It is akin to the logical concept of "proving too much". The phrase is used somewhat differently in modern Hebrew, to the effect of "if you try to do too much of something, you might fail to do it altogether". [2] For example: "You shouldn't take that many courses, you'll end up failing them all - tafasta merube, lo tafasta".
"Asking yourself questions that make you think can help you get a little more control over life," says Amy Kind, PhD, philosophy professor and director of the Gould Center for Humanistic Studies ...
The stylized dialectical exchanges Aristotle discusses in the Topics included rules for scoring the debate, and one important issue was precisely the matter of asking for the initial thing—which included not just making the actual thesis adopted by the answerer into a question, but also making a question out of a sentence that was too close ...
Overconfidence effect, a tendency to have excessive confidence in one's own answers to questions. For example, for certain types of questions, answers that people rate as "99% certain" turn out to be wrong 40% of the time. [5] [43] [44] [45] Planning fallacy, the tendency for people to underestimate the time it will take them to complete a ...
Reductio ad absurdum, painting by John Pettie exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1884. In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"), also known as argumentum ad absurdum (Latin for "argument to absurdity") or apagogical arguments, is the form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that the opposite scenario would lead to absurdity or contradiction.
Image credits: aamurusko79 The idea behind using life hacks is to simplify the things we do and to make our day-to-day tasks easier. The only problem is that psychology is still on the fence about ...