When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: do citations count against word of evidence in writing a claim based on scientific

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Scientific citation guidelines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Scientific...

    Five references are provided early on: two textbooks, a specialized monograph on aldol reactions, and two review articles. Most readers would assume that the bulk of the statements in the comparatively short Wikipedia article could be verified by checking any of these references, and so it may only be necessary to provide additional in-line references for controversial statements, for recent ...

  3. Wikipedia:When to cite - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_to_cite

    When using footnotes, the citation should be placed in the first footnote after the quotation. In-text attribution is often appropriate. Close paraphrasing: Add an inline citation when closely paraphrasing a source's words. In-text attribution is often appropriate, especially for statements describing a person's published opinions or words. In ...

  4. Scientific citation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_citation

    For example, bibliographic coupling and co-citation are association measures based on citation analysis (shared citations or shared references). The citations in a collection of documents can also be represented in forms such as a citation graph, as pointed out by Derek J. de Solla Price in his 1965 article "Networks of Scientific Papers". [7]

  5. Help:Citations quick reference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Citations_quick_reference

    Citations can also be placed as external links, but these are not preferred because they are prone to link rot and usually lack the full information necessary to find the original source in cases of link rot.

  6. Wikipedia:Citation overkill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_overkill

    This is usually a short-term issue, and is often better handled by discussing the evidence on the talk page, if the additional citation does not really increase verifiability (e.g., because the original citation, with which the added one would be redundant, is to a clearly reliable source, and there are no disputes about its accuracy or about ...

  7. Wikipedia:Citing sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources

    If all or most of the citations in an article consist of bare URLs, or otherwise fail to provide needed bibliographic data – such as the name of the source, the title of the article or web page consulted, the author (if known), the publication date (if known), and the page numbers (where relevant) – then that would not count as a ...

  8. Wikipedia:Verifiability

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    Consider adding a citation needed tag as an interim step to removing to allow references to be added. [ d ] When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, state your concern that it may not be possible to find a published reliable source, and the material therefore may not be verifiable.

  9. Wikipedia:Citation underkill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_underkill

    It is not a valid argument to keep the additional citations when they do not verify the entire claim. However, if a sentence is making two separate claims it would be best to use a satisfactory source for each, placed following its respective claim. If one of the citations verifies the entire claim then you may only need to use one citation ...

  1. Related searches do citations count against word of evidence in writing a claim based on scientific

    scientific citation exampleswhen to cite a word
    science citation guidelineswhen to cite an article
    when to cite a statement