When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: do citations count against word of evidence in writing a claim based on information

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:When to cite - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_to_cite

    In case of multiple possible references for a statement, the best reliable sources should be used. Quotations: Add an inline citation when quoting published material, whether within quotation marks or not, whether using direct or indirect speech. When using footnotes, the citation should be placed in the first footnote after the quotation.

  3. Help:Citations quick reference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Citations_quick_reference

    Citations can also be placed as external links, but these are not preferred because they are prone to link rot and usually lack the full information necessary to find the original source in cases of link rot. In cases where citations are lacking, the template {} can be added after the statement in question.

  4. Case citation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_citation

    United States Reports, the official reporter of the Supreme Court of the United States. Case citation is a system used by legal professionals to identify past court case decisions, either in series of books called reporters or law reports, or in a neutral style that identifies a decision regardless of where it is reported.

  5. Wikipedia:Citation underkill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_underkill

    It is not a valid argument to keep the additional citations when they do not verify the entire claim. However, if a sentence is making two separate claims it would be best to use a satisfactory source for each, placed following its respective claim. If one of the citations verifies the entire claim then you may only need to use one citation ...

  6. Wikipedia:Citation overkill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_overkill

    This is usually a short-term issue, and is often better handled by discussing the evidence on the talk page, if the additional citation does not really increase verifiability (e.g., because the original citation, with which the added one would be redundant, is to a clearly reliable source, and there are no disputes about its accuracy or about ...

  7. Wikipedia:Claims require specific evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Claims_require...

    Unsubstantiated claims, which lack specific evidence, involve some common fallacies, which can mislead other editors into false conclusions. Some common fallacies of baseless claims include: Begging the question - asserting a claim as if true but without proof; Argumentum ad nauseam - repeating remarks, typically with "walls of text" which lack ...

  8. Wikipedia:Verifiability

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    Even when information is cited to reliable sources, you must present it with a neutral point of view (NPOV). Articles should be based on thorough research of sources. All articles must adhere to NPOV, fairly representing all majority and significant-minority viewpoints published by reliable sources, in rough proportion to the prominence of each ...

  9. Wikipedia:Scientific citation guidelines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Scientific...

    Five references are provided early on: two textbooks, a specialized monograph on aldol reactions, and two review articles. Most readers would assume that the bulk of the statements in the comparatively short Wikipedia article could be verified by checking any of these references, and so it may only be necessary to provide additional in-line references for controversial statements, for recent ...