Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In United States labor law, at-will employment is an employer's ability to dismiss an employee for any reason (that is, without having to establish "just cause" for termination), and without warning, [1] as long as the reason is not illegal (e.g. firing because of the employee's gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, or disability status).
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
Another exemption in §213(a)(15) is for people "employed in domestic service employment to provide companionship services". In Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke, a corporation claimed exemption, although Breyer J for a unanimous court agreed with the Department of Labor that it was only intended for carers in private homes. [127]
Department of Labor poster notifying employees of rights under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 29 U.S.C. § 203 [1] (FLSA) is a United States labor law that creates the right to a minimum wage, and "time-and-a-half" overtime pay when people work over forty hours a week.
(The Center Square) – Military spouses will be exempt from federal return-to-work mandates, according to a memorandum from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. The exemption follows ...
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.: You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work
Exempt businesses employing less than 10 workers from contributing to the HCGF37! Provide Federal assistance for purchasing insurance to businesses employing between 10 and 30 workers38! Federal health voucher program would relieve American businesses of financial responsibility of insuring their workers No information found !
In Bammert v.Don's Super Valu, Inc., 646 N.W.2d 365 (Wis. 2002), the Wisconsin Supreme Court was faced with "a single question of first-impression: can the public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine be invoked when an at-will employee is fired in retaliation for the actions of his or her non-employee spouse?"