When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The aim of the PRISMA statement is to help authors improve the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. [3] PRISMA has mainly focused on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized trials, but it can also be used as a basis for reporting reviews of other types of research (e.g., diagnostic studies, observational studies).

  3. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consolidated_Standards_of...

    The main product of the CONSORT Group is the CONSORT Statement, [1] which is an evidence-based, minimum set of recommendations for reporting randomized trials.It offers a standard way for authors to prepare reports of trial findings, facilitating their complete and transparent reporting, reducing the influence of bias on their results, and aiding their critical appraisal and interpretation.

  4. Inclusion and exclusion criteria - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusion_and_exclusion...

    Exclusion criteria concern properties of the study sample, defining reasons for which patients from the target population are to be excluded from the current study sample. Typical exclusion criteria are defined for either ethical reasons (e.g., children, pregnant women, patients with psychological illnesses, patients who are not able or willing ...

  5. Glossary of experimental design - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_experimental...

    Coding Factor Levels: Transforming the scale of measurement for a factor so that the high value becomes +1 and the low value becomes -1 (see scaling). After coding all factors in a 2-level full factorial experiment, the design matrix has all orthogonal columns. Coding is a simple linear transformation of the original measurement scale.

  6. Statistical conclusion validity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_conclusion...

    Statistical conclusion validity is the degree to which conclusions about the relationship among variables based on the data are correct or "reasonable". This began as being solely about whether the statistical conclusion about the relationship of the variables was correct, but now there is a movement towards moving to "reasonable" conclusions that use: quantitative, statistical, and ...

  7. Validity (statistics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity_(statistics)

    The question of whether results from a particular study generalize to other people, places or times arises only when one follows an inductivist research strategy. If the goal of a study is to deductively test a theory, one is only concerned with factors which might undermine the rigor of the study, i.e. threats to internal validity. In other ...

  8. External validity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_validity

    External validity is the validity of applying the conclusions of a scientific study outside the context of that study. [1] In other words, it is the extent to which the results of a study can generalize or transport to other situations, people, stimuli, and times.

  9. Methodology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodology

    [1] [7] [2] [11] In this regard, methodology may be defined as "the study or description of methods" or as "the analysis of the principles of methods, rules, and postulates employed by a discipline". [ 12 ] [ 13 ] This study or analysis involves uncovering assumptions and practices associated with the different methods and a detailed ...