Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Fī aṣnāf al-ḥayawānāt wa-ʿajāʾib hayākilihā wa-gharāʾib aḥwālihā (Arabic: في أصناف الحيوانات وعجائب هياكلها وغرائب أحوالها), [1] known in English as The Case of the Animals versus Man Before the King of the Jinn, [a] is an epistle written by the Brethren of Purity (Ikhwān al-Ṣafā) in the 960s and first published as Epistle 22 in ...
Daniel Dombrowski writes that the argument can be traced to Porphyry's third-century treatise On Abstinence from Eating Animals. [7] Danish philosopher Laurids Smith who was familiar with the arguments of Wilhelm Dietler argued against the idea that animals cannot possess rights because they cannot understand the ideas of right and duty.
The initial inspiration for the book was the discovery of an article called "The Rights of Animals" by the novelist Brigid Brophy, which had been published in The Sunday Times in October 1965. Brophy's piece was devastating in its brief and unsentimental statement of the case for animal rights. It began:
On Tuesday, Oct. 29's episode of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, the West Side Story actress, 23, was joined by Jack Antonoff, 40, to perform "Man of the House" — which is among a handful of ...
Mirvahedy did not establish a general right to compensation from the animal's owner. In the light of Clark v Bowlt [2006] EWCA Civ 978, McKenny v Foster [2008] EWCA Civ 173 and Freeman v Higher Park Farm [2008] EWCA Civ 1185, [4] it is clear that what Mirvahedy established is a second limb to the Animals Act 1971 Section 2(2)(b), covering ...
Video games rarely depict anything realistically. This is most obvious in the personification of animals. Just how much do animals in video games differ from their real life counterparts? Let's ...
Steel was a member in the band's heyday and left in 1966, before the band broke up three years later; he later played in various reunion versions of the band with Burdon. Burdon still toured as Eric Burdon and the Animals, but was prevented from using the name "the Animals" in Britain while the case was under appeal.
The Guardian called it an "exemplary animal rights documentary", and that it "presents some fascinating legal and ethical issues". [2] However, Variety ' s critic, Peter Debruge, accused Wise of "trying to trick a series of New York state judges into granting chimpanzees the same rights as humans" and called his efforts a "publicity stunt."