When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutan_v._Republican_Party...

    Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that the First Amendment forbids a government entity from basing its decision to promote, transfer, recall, or hire low-level public employees based upon their party affiliation. [1]

  3. Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torres_v._Texas_Department...

    Texas Department of Public Safety, 597 U.S. 580 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA) and state sovereign immunity. In a 5–4 decision issued in June 2022, the Court ruled that state sovereign immunity does not prevent states from being sued ...

  4. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal.2d 453, 150 P.2d 436 (1944) Important case in the development of the common law of product liability in the United States based on the concurring opinion of California Supreme Court justice Roger Traynor who stated "that a manufacturer incurs an absolute liability when an article that he has placed on the market ...

  5. Monroe v. Pape - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_v._Pape

    Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961), was a United States Supreme Court case that considered the application of federal civil rights law to constitutional violations by city employees. The case was significant because it held that 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , a statutory provision from 1871, could be used to sue state officers who violated a plaintiff's ...

  6. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ledbetter_v._Goodyear_Tire...

    Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007), is an employment discrimination decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. [1] The result was that employers could not be sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 over race or gender pay discrimination if the claims were based on decisions made by the employer 180 days or more before the claim.

  7. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/controversial-labor-law-doesnt...

    The California Supreme Court ruling curtails the ability of public employees in the state to seek help from the courts in labor disputes. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ...

  8. A look at Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s notable opinions, votes

    www.aol.com/news/2020-10-11-a-look-at-judge-amy...

    Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, has written roughly 100 opinions in more than three years on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

  9. Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_Systems_Corp._v._Lewis

    Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on how two federal laws, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), relate to whether employment contracts can legally bar employees from collective arbitration.