Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The WikiProject COVID-19/Case Count Task Force (WP C19CCTF) that "COVID-19 confirmed cases, deaths and recovery counts" data are based on reliable sources. But these "reliable sources" are in fact open data provided by government health agencies [ 3 ] from around the world, who have fundamentally different methods of providing information to ...
This means a reliable published source must exist for it, whether or not it is cited in the article. Sources must support the material clearly and directly: drawing inferences from multiple sources to advance a novel position is prohibited by the NOR policy. [h] Base articles largely on reliable secondary sources.
Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians, who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves.
The site has become the world’s largest source of information and sixth most visited website; nearly all online search results include a Wikipedia article as one of the top ten choices [1]. At a glance, it is obvious that Wikipedia is very popular and well-known, and for its popularity Wikipedia has become the center of controversy.
The English Wikipedia's editor pool, roughly 40,000 active editors who make five edits monthly, largely skews male and white, leading to gender- and race-based systemic biases in coverage. Variations in coverage mean that Wikipedia can be both, as online communities professor Amy S. Bruckman put it, "the most accurate form of information ever ...
But the information you read might not always be the most accurate. ... Just because an account has a verified check mark or is well-known does not make the account sharing a story trustworthy.
In Wikipedia, verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that information comes from a reliable source. No original research – Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis ...
Consequently, some judgment and comparison of sources is needed in order to identify reliable sources. Reliable sources respect truth; a source that is commonly untruthful is not reliable. A source may be partly or more or less reliable. Concurrence of possibly reliable sources may help in identifying reliable sources, and editors should seek it.