When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:When sources are wrong - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_sources_are...

    Sometimes it's clear, based on editorial analysis of a source, that it is wrong, but there is no substitute source that is clearly right. Here it bears mentioning: We do not engage in original primary or secondary research, but we are creators of original tertiary analysis. That is what we do as encyclopedists.

  3. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is wrong - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_wrong

    It is not until secondary sources are published which correct these errors, that these corrections will be reflected in encyclopedias. In a general sense, a stream cannot rise higher than its source. So too with Wikipedia. In simple English, Wikipedia editors can basically use anything that has a source and is considered credible.

  4. Wikipedia:Inaccuracy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Inaccuracy

    Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made and is the best such source for that context. Proper sourcing always depends on context; common sense and editorial judgment are an indispensable part of the process. Deciding which sources are appropriate depends on context.

  5. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not...

    Wikipedia pages often cite reliable secondary sources that vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary or secondary source, you ought be able to cite that primary or secondary source and eliminate the middleman (or "middle-page" in this case).

  6. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    The following presents a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed. This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia.

  7. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    Sources accepted as reliable for Wikipedia may rely on Wikipedia as a reference source, sometimes indirectly. If the original information in Wikipedia was false, once it has been reported in sources considered reliable, Wikipedia can use them to reference the false information, giving an apparent credibility to falsehood.

  8. Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a Citable Source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_as_a...

    Research papers, particularly the one research paper students write in their eleventh grade, have always been an integral part of high school education [4].They stress the need to verify information and teach students how to evaluate sources critically, and as a result, teachers have developed various criteria to help students identify credible sources, an especially important skill in the ...

  9. Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Accuracy_dispute

    Additionally, incorporate any sources utilized for verification into the article, see Wikipedia:Cite your sources. Should the statement's neutrality be contentious, see Wikipedia:NPOV dispute for more details about addressing the issue. If you cannot correct it right away: First, insert a "Dubious" section on the talk page to describe the problem.