Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A maximum matching (also known as maximum-cardinality matching [2]) is a matching that contains the largest possible number of edges. There may be many maximum matchings. The matching number of a graph G is the size of a maximum matching. Every maximum matching is maximal, but not every maximal matching is a maximum matching.
Maximum cardinality matching is a fundamental problem in graph theory. [1] We are given a graph G, and the goal is to find a matching containing as many edges as possible; that is, a maximum cardinality subset of the edges such that each vertex is adjacent to at most one edge of the subset. As each edge will cover exactly two vertices, this ...
Therefore, by the Tutte–Berge formula, it has at most (1−3+16)/2 = 7 edges in any matching. In the mathematical discipline of graph theory the Tutte–Berge formula is a characterization of the size of a maximum matching in a graph.
Every perfect matching is a maximum-cardinality matching, but the opposite is not true. For example, consider the following graphs: [1] In graph (b) there is a perfect matching (of size 3) since all 6 vertices are matched; in graphs (a) and (c) there is a maximum-cardinality matching (of size 2) which is not perfect, since some vertices are ...
In computer science, the Hopcroft–Karp algorithm (sometimes more accurately called the Hopcroft–Karp–Karzanov algorithm) [1] is an algorithm that takes a bipartite graph as input and produces a maximum-cardinality matching as output — a set of as many edges as possible with the property that no two edges share an endpoint.
An example of a bipartite graph, with a maximum matching (blue) and minimum vertex cover (red) both of size six. In the mathematical area of graph theory, Kőnig's theorem, proved by Dénes Kőnig (), describes an equivalence between the maximum matching problem and the minimum vertex cover problem in bipartite graphs.
There is also a constant s which is at most the cardinality of a maximum matching in the graph. The goal is to find a minimum-cost matching of size exactly s. The most common case is the case in which the graph admits a one-sided-perfect matching (i.e., a matching of size r), and s=r. Unbalanced assignment can be reduced to a balanced assignment.
Let M be a maximum matching and consider an alternating chain such that the edges in the path alternates between being and not being in M.If the alternating chain is a cycle or a path of even length starting on an unmatched vertex, then a new maximum matching M ′ can be found by interchanging the edges found in M and not in M.