Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Larger kurtosis indicates a more serious outlier problem, and may lead the researcher to choose alternative statistical methods. D'Agostino's K-squared test is a goodness-of-fit normality test based on a combination of the sample skewness and sample kurtosis, as is the Jarque–Bera test for normality.
The sample skewness g 1 and kurtosis g 2 are both asymptotically normal. However, the rate of their convergence to the distribution limit is frustratingly slow, especially for g 2 . For example even with n = 5000 observations the sample kurtosis g 2 has both the skewness and the kurtosis of approximately 0.3, which is not negligible.
Example distribution with positive skewness. These data are from experiments on wheat grass growth. In probability theory and statistics, skewness is a measure of the asymmetry of the probability distribution of a real-valued random variable about its mean. The skewness value can be positive, zero, negative, or undefined.
The null hypothesis is a joint hypothesis of the skewness being zero and the excess kurtosis being zero. Samples from a normal distribution have an expected skewness of 0 and an expected excess kurtosis of 0 (which is the same as a kurtosis of 3). As the definition of JB shows, any deviation from this increases the JB statistic.
The normal probability plot is a graphical technique to identify substantive departures from normality.This includes identifying outliers, skewness, kurtosis, a need for transformations, and mixtures.
The shape of a distribution may be considered either descriptively, using terms such as "J-shaped", or numerically, using quantitative measures such as skewness and kurtosis.
The first is the square of the skewness: β 1 = γ 1 where γ 1 is the skewness, or third standardized moment. The second is the traditional kurtosis, or fourth standardized moment: β 2 = γ 2 + 3. (Modern treatments define kurtosis γ 2 in terms of cumulants instead of moments, so that for a normal distribution we have γ 2 = 0 and β 2 = 3.
Skewness risk and kurtosis risk also have technical implications in calculation of value at risk. If either are ignored, the Value at Risk calculations will be flawed. Benoît Mandelbrot, a French mathematician, extensively researched this issue.