Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Armstrong v Jackson [1917] 2 KB 822; Kelly v Cooper [1993] AC 205; Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339, duty to not accept bribes. [a] Industries & General Mortgage Co Ltd v Lewis [1949] 2 All ER 573; Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid [1994] 1 AC 324; De Bussche v Alt (1878) 8 ChD 286, duty to not delegate authority
Armstrong v. United States (an Insular Case) 243 (1901) Brown none none Ct. Cl. reversed Downes v. Bidwell (an Insular Case) 244 (1901) Brown White; Gray Fuller; Harlan C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed Huus v. New York and Port Rico Steamship Company (an Insular Case) 392 (1901) Brown none none 2d Cir. certification Carson v. Brockton Sewage Commission ...
United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456 (1996), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the court held that the burden of proof for selective prosecution rests with the defendant, who must show the government declined to prosecute similarly situated suspects of other races.
Exerlena Jackson, Wharlest Jackson's wife, later commented "I begged him not to take that job". Just two years earlier, the same circumstances had befallen a friend of the Jackson family, Metcalfe. He was the president of the local chapter of the NAACP and Wharlest worked under him as its treasurer. After receiving a promotion at Armstrong ...
Prosection and defence delivered closing arguments before deliberations began
Armstrong I–VIII [note 1] were a lengthy series of lawsuits and other legal actions, primarily in the California state courts, arising from Gerald Armstrong's departure from the Church of Scientology (COS). The COS argued that Armstrong, a former COS employee, improperly took private papers belonging to the Church, while Armstrong argued that ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
The Supreme Court opens its new term Monday, hearing arguments for the first time after a summer break and with new Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Already the court has said it will decide cases ...