When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Intermediate scrutiny - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_scrutiny

    Intermediate scrutiny may be contrasted with "strict scrutiny", the higher standard of review that requires narrowly tailored and least restrictive means to further a compelling governmental interest, and "rational basis review", a lower standard of review that requires the law or policy be rationally related to a legitimate government interest.

  3. Rational basis review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_basis_review

    The higher levels of scrutiny are intermediate scrutiny and strict scrutiny. [2] Heightened scrutiny is applied where a suspect or quasi-suspect classification is involved, or a fundamental right is implicated. [1] In U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence, the nature of the interest at issue determines the level of scrutiny applied by appellate ...

  4. Substantive due process - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_due_process

    To pass strict scrutiny, the law or the act must be both narrowly tailored and the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling government interest. If the governmental restriction restricts liberty in a manner that does not implicate a fundamental right, rational basis review is used, which determines whether a law or act is rationally ...

  5. Standard of review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_of_review

    Under the Equal Protection Clause, when the law targets a "quasi-suspect" classification, such as gender, the courts apply intermediate scrutiny, which requires the law to be substantially related to an important government interest. As the name implies, it is more strict than rational basis review but less strict than strict scrutiny.

  6. Strict scrutiny - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_scrutiny

    Another example is the D.C. Circuit Court's 2007 ruling in Abigail Alliance v. von Eschenbach that compelling government interest was demonstrated in the restriction of unapproved prescription drugs. [1] The burden of proof falls on the state in cases that require strict scrutiny or intermediate scrutiny, but not the rational basis.

  7. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-03-09-amicus.pdf

    Amici Curiae are also fully dedicated to ensuring that the federal government’s process for reviewing all energy development projects – whether fossil fuel or renewable – complies with bedrock environmental laws. For that reason, we have participated in every significant phase of the regulatory approval process for the Project.

  8. Government interest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_interest

    In the United States, the concept of government interest arises especially when certain constitutional issues are before a court of law.Under US constitutional jurisprudence, arising from US Supreme Court decisions, the courts weigh the government's interest in a particular subject matter against the impact of restrictions being imposed on the individuals' rights and interests.

  9. Why Pamela Anderson Goes Makeup-Free in “The Last ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/why-pamela-anderson-goes-makeup...

    Pamela Anderson often chooses not to wear makeup — and so does the woman she plays in The Last Showgirl.. In a new interview with PEOPLE, Anderson, 57, explains why her character, Shelly — a ...