Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 is a multidistrict litigation (MDL) lawsuit that seeks redress for the victims of the September 11 terrorist attacks and their families. The suit is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York .
In the legal system in the United States, In re is used to indicate that a judicial proceeding may not have formally designated adverse parties or is otherwise uncontested. In re is an alternative to the more typical adversarial form of case designation, which names each case as "Plaintiff v. (versus) Defendant", as in Roe v. Wade or Miranda v ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
In re: Don McGahn (also: Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives v. Donald F. McGahn II ; U.S. House Judiciary Committee v. Donald F. McGahn ) is a U.S. constitutional case lawsuit (1:19-cv-02379) filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia by the House Judiciary Committee to compel the ...
On December 14, 2020, a petition was filed in the Wisconsin Supreme Court by Mark Jefferson and the Republican Party of Wisconsin seeking a declaration that (1) Dane County lacks the authority to issue an interpretation of Wisconsin's election law allowing all electors in Dane County to obtain an absentee ballot without a photo identification ...
In re Ferguson, 558 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2009) [1] is an early 2009 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, affirming a rejection of business method claims by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
In re Bilski; Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: Full case name: In re Bernard L. Bilski and Rand A. Warsaw : Argued: May 8 2008: Decided: October 30 2008: Citation: 545 F.3d 943, 88 U.S.P.Q.2d 1385: Case history; Prior history: Claims rejected, Ex parte Bilski (BPAI 2006), appealed to CAFC, en banc hearing ordered ...
In re A.C., 573 A.2d 1235 (1990), was a District of Columbia Court of Appeals case. It was the first American appellate court case decided against a forced Caesarean section , although the decision was issued after the fatal procedure was performed. [ 1 ]