When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: small claims court for compensation california case

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Small claims court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_claims_court

    The jurisdiction of small-claims courts typically encompasses private disputes that do not involve large amounts of money. The routine collection of small debts forms a large portion of the cases brought to small-claims courts, as well as evictions and other disputes between landlords and tenants, unless the jurisdiction is already covered by a tenancy board.

  3. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018. A class of drivers for a same-day delivery company, Dynamex, claimed that they were misclassified as independent contractors and thus unlawfully deprived of ...

  4. California superior courts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Superior_Courts

    Many of California's larger superior courts have specialized divisions for different types of cases like criminal, civil, traffic, small claims, probate, family, juvenile, and complex litigation, but these divisions are simply administrative assignments that can be rearranged at the discretion of each superior court's presiding judge in ...

  5. Ajaxo Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajaxo_Inc._v._E*Trade...

    Ajaxo Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corp., 187 Cal.App.4th 1295 (2010), is the second appeal on a dispute dated back to 1999. [1] During the original 2000 case, defendant E*Trade, an online financial services company, was found liable for maliciously and willfully misappropriating trade secrets pertaining to wireless stock trading technology acquired from the plaintiff, Ajaxo.

  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v...

    Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. [1]

  7. California Supreme Court upholds Uber workers' right to sue

    www.aol.com/news/california-supreme-court...

    The decision follows a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June 2022 in another California case, Viking River Cruises Inc. vs. Moriana, in which the high court concluded the opposite, that PAGA violated ...