Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the ...
This article reads like a scientific review article and potentially contains biased syntheses of primary sources. Please replace inadequate primary references with secondary sources. See the talk page for details. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This template is to be used on main pages and talk pages of articles that have been though academic peer review and published in whole or in part in an academic journal. The template dislays differently when included on a main vs talkpage (see examples below) and for whether the article was adapted from wikipedia initially ( W2J ) or written ...
The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...
Random article; About Wikipedia; ... 3 Categories for pages using these templates. ... Toggle the table of contents. Template: Academic-written review/doc. Add ...
The article Article you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Article for comments about the article. Well done! Your GA nomination of Article. The article Article you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Article for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a ...
What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Get shortened URL
{{external peer review | org = organization that conducted the review; please do not include markup | desc = brief description of organization that conducted the review, e.g., "scientific society" | date = date (optional) | url = url of the review, if present (optional) | revision = revision number of the article that was reviewed, e.g ...