When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Baze v. Rees - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baze_v._Rees

    And indeed, it is the retribution rationale that animates much of the remaining enthusiasm for the death penalty. As Lord Justice Denning argued in 1950, " 'some crimes are so outrageous that society insists on adequate punishment, because the wrong-doer deserves it, irrespective of whether it is a deterrent or not.

  3. Riggins v. Nevada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riggins_v._Nevada

    Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court decided whether a mentally ill person can be forced to take antipsychotic medication while they are on trial to allow the state to make sure they remain competent during the trial.

  4. Glossip v. Gross - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossip_v._Gross

    Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. 863 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 5–4, that lethal injections using midazolam to kill prisoners convicted of capital crimes do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  5. Oklahoma and its affinity for the death penalty - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/oklahoma-affinity-death-penalty...

    State capital cases, or death penalty proceedings, cost state taxpayers 3.2 times more than noncapital cases on average, according to the 2017 study of the Oklahoma death penalty. More revealing ...

  6. Yet when I covered a death penalty case of a young man accused of killing a beloved area restaurant owner, execution wasn’t a slam dunk for me. Seated directly behind the defendant, I could see ...

  7. Furman v. Georgia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furman_v._Georgia

    Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), was a landmark criminal case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that arbitrary and inconsistent imposition of the death penalty violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

  8. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case Ruling Right 1976 Profitt v. Florida: Permitted comparison of mitigating and aggravating factors to decide death penalty decisions. [3] See also Furman v. Georgia (1972), and Gregg v. Georgia (1976) 1st 1986 Ford v. Wainwright: Preventing the execution [capital punishment] of the insane, requiring an evaluation of competency and an ...

  9. Killer with Nazi face tattoos sentenced to death for murder ...

    www.aol.com/killer-nazi-face-tattoos-sentenced...

    The jury voted in favor of the death penalty 9-3 in Melton’s case, and 10-2 in Ruiz’s murder. In Florida, only eight out of 12 jurors need to recommend the death penalty for it to be ...