When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Non-publication of legal opinions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-publication_of_legal...

    Non-publication of legal opinions is the practice of a court issuing unpublished opinions. An unpublished opinion is a decision of a court that is not available for citation as precedent because the court deems the case to have insufficient precedential value. In the system of common law, each judicial decision becomes part of the body of law ...

  3. Memorandum opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memorandum_opinion

    Under United States legal practice, a memorandum opinion is usually unpublished and cannot be cited as precedent. It is formally defined as: "[a] unanimous appellate opinion that succinctly states the decision of the court; an opinion that briefly reports the court's conclusion, usu. without elaboration because the decision follows a well-established legal principle or does not relate to any ...

  4. Federal Appendix - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Appendix

    The Federal Appendix organizes court opinions within each volume by the date of the decision, and includes the full text of the court's opinion. West attorney editors add headnotes that summarize key principles of law in the cases, and Key Numbers that classify the decisions by topic within the West American Digest System .

  5. Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sipuel_v._Board_of_Regents...

    The court ruled that the state of Oklahoma must provide instruction for Blacks equal to that of Whites, requiring the admission of qualified black students to previously all-white state law schools, reversing the Supreme Court of Oklahoma decision. In 1950, the Supreme Court again ruled unanimously in Sweatt v. Painter, a case in which Herman ...

  6. Goss v. Lopez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goss_v._Lopez

    The law required students' parents to be notified of the action within 24 hours to be given the reason. If students were expelled, they could appeal to the Board of Education, but §3313.66 gave no such allowances if they were suspended. A three-judge District Court struck down the law as a violation of students' right to due process of law.

  7. Agostini v. Felton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agostini_v._Felton

    Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.In this case, the Court overruled its decision in Aguilar v.. Felton (1985), now finding that it was not a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment for a state-sponsored education initiative to allow public school teachers to instruct at religious schools, so long as ...

  8. Grove City College v. Bell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grove_City_College_v._Bell

    Grove City College v. Bell, 465 U.S. 555 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that Title IX, which applies only to colleges and universities that receive federal funds, could be applied to a private school that refused direct federal funding but for which a large number of students had received federally funded scholarships.

  9. Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Board_of...

    The District Court dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted, holding that because the very statute that created the property right in continued employment also specified the procedures for discharge, and because those procedures were followed, Loudermill was, by definition, afforded all the process due ...