When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gary Habermas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Habermas

    Gary Robert Habermas (born June 28, 1950) is an American New Testament scholar and theologian who frequently writes and lectures on the resurrection of Jesus.He has specialized in cataloging and communicating trends among scholars in the field of historical Jesus and New Testament studies.

  3. Quest for the historical Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quest_for_the_historical_Jesus

    For this reason, the historical Jesus is, in Meier's words, 'a modern abstraction and construct. ' " [153] According to James Dunn, "the historical Jesus is properly speaking a nineteenth and twentieth-century construction, not Jesus back then, and not a figure in history" (emphasis original). [190]

  4. Vision theory of Jesus' appearances - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vision_theory_of_Jesus...

    Several Christian scholars such as Gary Habermas, William Lane Craig and Michael Morrison have argued against the vision explanations for the textual accounts of a physical resurrection. [5] [6] [7] The view that the appearances of Jesus were subjective and the tomb not empty remains a minority in New Testament scholarship. [49]

  5. Evidential apologetics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidential_apologetics

    Evidential apologetics method looks at the New Testament's historical documents first, then upon to Jesus' miracles in particular the resurrection which evidentialists believe points to Jesus Christ as the Son of God. Some of the top supporters of this method include Gary Habermas, John Warwick Montgomery, Clark Pinnock, and Wolfhart Pannenberg ...

  6. Stolen body hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_body_hypothesis

    According to this version of the stolen body hypothesis, some of the disciples stole away Jesus's body. Potential reasons include wishing to bury Jesus themselves; believing that Jesus would soon return and wanting his body in their possession; a "pious deceit" to restore Jesus's good name after being crucified as a criminal; or an outright plot to fake a resurrection. [3]

  7. Scholarly interpretation of Gospel elements - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_interpretation...

    Christian scholars such as Dale Allison, William Lane Craig, Gary Habermas, and N. T. Wright conclude that Jesus did in fact rise from the dead. [151] The Jesus Seminar states: "In the view of the Seminar, he did not rise bodily from the dead; the resurrection is based instead on visionary experiences of Peter, Paul, and Mary [Magdalene]."

  8. Historicity of Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

    Part of the 6th-century Madaba Map asserting two possible baptism locations The crucifixion of Jesus as depicted by Mannerist painter Bronzino (c. 1545). There is no scholarly consensus concerning most elements of Jesus's life as described in the Christian and non-Christian sources, and reconstructions of the "historical Jesus" are broadly debated for their reliability, [note 7] [note 6] but ...

  9. Jesus Seminar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Seminar

    Distinguishing between the historical Jesus and the stories that the gospels tell about him. Hermann Samuel Reimarus (1694–1768) started the quest for the historical Jesus and David Friedrich Strauss established it as part of biblical criticism with his book Life of Jesus Critically Examined (1835). Distinguishing between the Synoptics and John.