When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. De Havilland Law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Law

    The De Havilland Law, [1] formally De Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, is a published judicial opinion interpreting California Labor Code Section 2855, [2] a California law which prevents a court from enforcing specific performance of an exclusive personal services contract (i.e., contracts creating a non-delegable duty on the part of an individual to another party, and no other, to render ...

  3. I Was Late For Work With No Excuse And Was Fired And Now I ...

    www.aol.com/news/2014-03-11-fired-for-lateness...

    I was recently terminated from my job because I was late. I did not give an excuse or a reason for my lateness. I called before my shift was scheduled to alert a manager of my lateness & nobody ...

  4. Los Angeles Times v. Free Republic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_Times_v._Free...

    On September 1, the Defendant's attorney was declared inactive by the State Bar of California due to noncompliance with Minimum Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) requirements. He was therefore declared not eligible to practice law. Buckley and Robinson later clashed publicly regarding related legal matters, and Buckley was banned from Free ...

  5. Attorney misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney_misconduct

    Attorney misconduct is unethical or illegal conduct by an attorney. Attorney misconduct may include: conflict of interest, overbilling, false or misleading statements, knowingly pursuing frivolous and meritless lawsuits, concealing evidence, abandoning a client, failing to disclose all relevant facts, arguing a position while neglecting to disclose prior law which might counter the argument ...

  6. California companies wrote their own gig worker law, but ...

    www.aol.com/california-companies-wrote-own-gig...

    Those cases predate Prop. 22, originating during a period when gig workers were misclassified and should have been considered employees under California law, the labor commissioner argues in the ...

  7. Cunningham v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cunningham_v._California

    California, 549 U.S. 270 (2007), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 6–3, that the sentencing standard set forward in Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) applies to California's determinate sentencing law. In California, a judge may choose one of three sentences for a crime—a low, middle, or high term.

  8. California lawmakers approve changes to law allowing workers ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-lawmakers-approve...

    The California Legislature approved bills Thursday that would amend a 20-year-old law allowing workers to sue their bosses over labor violations and require employers found liable to pay a fine to ...

  9. Private Attorneys General Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Attorneys_General_Act

    The Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) is a California statute that authorizes aggrieved employees to bring actions for civil penalties on behalf of themselves, other employees, and the State of California against their employers for California Labor Code violations. [1]