Ads
related to: practice using so and because in grammar ppt freeteacherspayteachers.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
smartholidayshopping.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
education.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The direct method in teaching a language is directly establishing an immediate and audiovisual association between experience and expression; words and phrases; idioms and meanings; and rules and performances through the teachers' body and mental skills, avoiding involvement of the learners' mother tongue.
It can zone in on one specific aspect of grammar or vocabulary, while still being a primarily communicative activity and giving the students communicative benefits. [15] This is an activity that should be used primarily in the lower levels of language classes, because it will be most beneficial to lower-level speakers.
To illustrate more completely how the do so test is employed, another test sentence is now used, one that contains two post-verbal adjunct phrases: We met them in the pub because we had time. (c) We did so in the pub because we had time. (did so = met them) (d) We did so because we had time. (did so = met them in the pub) (e) We did so.
So is an English word that, apart from its other uses, has become increasingly popular in recent years as a coordinating conjunctive opening word in a sentence. This device is particularly used when answering questions although the questioner may also use the device. So may also be used to end sentences. When ending a sentence, it may be:
A Grammar of the English Language (Oxford Language Classics). Oxford University Press. p. 256. ISBN 0-19-860508-0. Curme, George O. (1925). College English Grammar, Richmond, VA, Johnson Publishing company, 414 pages. A revised edition Principles and Practice of English Grammar was published by Barnes & Noble, in 1947.
According to Bell, this variety in use "offers a challenge for anyone wishing to enter into the analysis or deconstruction of methods". [5] The methods of teaching language may be characterized into three principal views: The structural view treats language as a system of structurally related elements to code meaning (e.g. grammar).