Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In November 2007, Obama was asked about the kind of justices he would appoint to the Supreme Court. He responded: I taught constitutional law for 10 years, and . . . when you look at what makes a great Supreme Court justice, it's not just the particular issue and how they rule, but it's their conception of the Court.
From shots taken along the campaign trail to personal photos inside the White House, Obama's love for kids is contagious.
The White House lit with the LGBT rainbow flag celebrating the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States, June 26, 2015. During his presidency, Obama, Congress, and the Supreme Court all contributed to a major expansion of LGBT rights.
Goodyear Tire and Rubber is a classic example of the Supreme Court putting activism over common sense," in reference to statements made by Republican critics who had labeled her as an activist judge. [38] After the conclusion of Senator Durbin's statements, the committee adjourned. [citation needed]
And these simple, sincere empathy statements offer the perfect responses in these situations. Empathy can foster a genuine, caring connection between two people and greatly deepen relationships.
Empathy is not a quality many Republican senators want to see in the next Supreme Court justice. Traditionally considered an admirable attribute, The post Supreme Court nominee’s ‘empathy ...
The total number of Obama Article III judgeship nominees to be confirmed by the United States Senate is 329, including two justices to the Supreme Court of the United States, 55 judges to the United States Courts of Appeals, 268 judges to the United States district courts, and four judges to the United States Court of International Trade. Obama ...
On May 15, 2008, in a statement in response to the ruling of the California Supreme Court, Obama announced his opposition to Proposition 8, an initiative measure proposed for the 2008 California General Election ballot that would amend the California Constitution to define the word "marriage" as the union of a man and a woman. [43]